Explanation of referees decisions (10th match day)

Wednesday, 9 November 2022
Explanations from the Cyprus Referee Commitee, regarding to the Referees team decisions from 10th round of Cyprus Cyta Championship. The situations which are explained, are only situations in which  VAR correctly or incorrectly intervened or did not  intervened, or did not intervene, in relation to the referees decision, according to the VAR protocol. 

Anorthosis - Nea Salamina, 38th minute
REF INITIAL DECISION: PLAY ON 
VAR: VAR INTERVENTION /OFR  HANDBALL -  PENALTY KICK 
REFEREE DECISION AFTER ON FIELD REVIEW: PENALTY KICK
EXPLANATION: DEFENDER PLAYER IN THE PENALTY BOX   CLEARLY TOUCHED THE BALL   WITH HIS ARM WHICH WAS OUT OF THE BODY IN UNNATURAL POSITION. REFEREE MISSED THIS SITUATION AND DECIDED TO PLAY ON. VAR CHECKED THE SITUATION,  FOUND THE CLEAR EVIDENCE FOR HANDBALL AND  INTERVENED CORRECTLY ACCORDING TO THE VAR PROTOCOL. REFEREE AFTER ON FIELD REVIEW  CHANGE THE DECISION ,AND AWARDED THE PENALTY, CORRECTLY.
CONSIDERATION FOR  VAR  INTERVENTION (  HANDBALL)  :
-HAND / ARM  IN UNNATURAL POSITION
-ARM MADE A BODY BIGGER
-BALL CLEARLY  TOUCHED  BY  THE ARM
VIDEO ΑΝΟΡΘΩΣΗ - ΝΕΑ ΣΑΛΑΜΙΝΑ 38ο λεπτό


Anorthosis - Nea Salamina, 90th minute
REF INITIAL DECISION: GOAL KICK 
VAR: VAR  NO INTERVENTION
CORRECT DECISION :   OFFSIDE
EXPLANATION: ATTACHING PLAYER WHO WAS IN OFFSIDE POSITION IN THE MOMENT WHEN HIS TEAM MATE PLAYED THE BALL,  CLEARLY  ATTEMPTING TO PLAY THE BALL  AND MAKING A OBVIOUS ACTION   WHICH WAS AΝ  INTEREFERING OF OPPONENT. ASSISTANT REFEREE MISSED THE OFFSIDE OFFENCE  AND  DID NOT RASE THE FLAG THE BOTH PLAYERS, DEFENDER AND ATACHER USED HANDS IN THE NORMAL FOOTBALL CONTACT   IN THE BATTLE FOR THE POSITION, DEFENDER PLAYER PLAYED THE BALL   WITH THE TOP OF THE SHOE  BEFORE  FELL  ON THE GROUND TOGETHER WITH THE ATTACKER PLAYER.  REFEREE DID NOT AWARDED THE PENALTY, CORRECTLY. VAR CHECKED THE SITUATION, AND DID NOT INTERVENE CORRECTLY ACCORDING TO THE VAR PROTOCOL.
VIDEO ΑΝΟΡΘΩΣΗ - ΝΕΑ ΣΑΛΑΜΙΝΑ 90ο λεπτό


AEL - PAFOS F.C., 45th minute
REF INITIAL DECISION: OFFSIDE / NO GOAL
VAR :  VAR INTERVENTION / VAR REVIEW  – GOAL – ONSIDE
REFEREE AFTER  VAR REVIEW  : GOAL
EXPLANATION : ASSISTANT REFEREE AND REFEREE FOLLOWED THE OFFSIDE VAR  PROCEDURE, DELAY THE FLAG   AND AFTER  THE GOAL SCORED , AWARDED OFFSIDE OFFENCE, INCORRECTLY. VAR CHECKED THE SITUATION, PERFORMED THE OFFSIDE LINE PROCEDURE CORRECTLY, AND USING  TRIANGULATION METHOD CORRECT SOLUTION OBTAINED BY SOFTER .  VAR  INTERVENED  ACCORDING TO THE VAR PROTOCOL , CORRECTLY. THE REFEREE AFTER VAR REVIEW CHANGE THE DECISION  ACCORDING TO THE VAR PROTOCOL ,CORRECTLY.


AEL - PAFOS F.C., 23th minute
REF INITIAL DECISION: PLAY ON
VAR :  VAR INTERVENTION, ON FIELD REVIEW – PENALTY KICK + YELLOW CARD
REFEREE AFTER ON FIELD REVIEW : PENALTY KICK + YELLOW CARD 
EXPLANATION : DEFENDER PLAYER  JUMP WITH ATTACHAKER IN THE FIGHT FOR THE BALL     CLEARLY  USES HIS ELBOW  IN A ILLEGAL MANNER, KICK ATTACHER IN THE FACE WHICH WAS A REASON BECOUSE  ATTACHER FELL TO THE GROUND . REFEREE MISSED THIS OFFENCE AND DECIDED TO PLAY ON . VAR  CHECKED THE SITUATION ,FOUND A CLEAR EVIDENCE AND INTERVENED ACCORDING TO THE VAR PROTOCOL ,CORRECTLY .REFEREE AFTER ON FIELD REVIEW CHANGE THE DECISION , CORRECTLY
Consideration for VAR intervention :
-Defender did not play the ball
-reclles tackle
 -clearly movement with elbow to the face
VIDEO ΑΕΛ - ΠΑΦΟΣ 23ο λεπτό

Olympiakos - Doxa, 23th minute
REF INITIAL DECISION: PENALTY KICK  
VAR : VAR   INTERVENTION /VAR REVIEW  - DIRECT FREE KICK
REFEREE DECISION AFTER VAR REVIEW  REVIEW : DIRECT FREE KICK
EXPLANATION :  REFEREE AWARDED A PENALTY KICK BECAUSE OF THE FOUL ( TRIPPING) FROM THE DEFENDER PLAYER . VAR CHECKED THE SITUATION , FOUND A CLEAR EVIDENCE THAT FOUL WAS OUT SIDE OF THE PENALTY BOX AND INTERVENED ACCORDING TO THE VAR PROTOCOL, CORRECTLY.REFEREE AFTER VAR REVIEW CHANGED THE DECISION , CORRECTLY
CONSIDERATION FOR  VAR  INTERVENTION :
-FOUL OUTSIDE OF THE PENALTY BOX
VIDEO ΟΛΥΜΠΙΑΚΟΣ - ΔΟΞΑ, 23ο λεπτό

Olympiakos - Doxa, 35th minute

REF INITIAL DECISION:  PLAY ON
VAR : VAR INTERVENTION /ON FIELD REVIEW -   HANDBALL -  PENALTY KICK 
REFEREE DECISION AFTER ON FIELD REVIEW : PENALTY KICK
EXPLANATION: DEFENDER PLAYER  JUMP  FRONT OF THE ATTACHER  PLAYER AND TRIED TO PLAYED THE BALL WITH THE  HEAD. HE MISSED THE BALL WITH HEAD AND MADE A SMALL EXTRA MOVEMENT WITH HIS ARM WHICH CLEARLY TOUCHED THE BALL.  ARM / HAND WAS CLEARLY   OUT OF THE BODY. REFEREE MISSED THIS SITUATION AND DECIDED TO PLAY ON. VAR CHECKED THE SITUATION,  FOUND A CLEAR EVIDENCE FOR HANDBALL AND  INTERVENED,CORRECTLY ACCORDING TO THE VAR PROTOCOL. REFEREE AFTER ON FIELD REVIEW  CHANGE THE DECISION ,AND AWARDED THE PENALTY, CORRECTLY.
CONSIDERATION FOR  VAR  INTERVENTION (  HANDBALL):
-HAND / ARM  OUT  OF THE BODY
-EXTRA MOVEMENT WITH HAND / ARM
- BALL CLEARLY  TOUCHED  BY  THE HAND
-BALL CHANGED THE DIRECTION
VIDEO ΟΛΥΜΠΙΑΚΟΣ - ΔΟΞΑ, 35ο λεπτό

Olympiakos - Doxa, 80th minute

REF INITIAL DECISION: PENALTY KICK
VAR : VAR NO  INTERVENTION , PENALTY CONFIRMED
EXPLANATION: DEFENDER PLAYER TRIED TO PLAY  THE BALL WHICH FELL FROM THE AIR,  WITH HIS HEAD. HE MISSED THE BALL, AND AFTER THE BALL BOUNCED OFF THE GROUND CLEARLY TOUCHED THE ARM OF DEFENDER PLAYER, WHICH WAS  CLEARLY OUT OF THE BODY MAKING THE BODY BIGGER. REFEREE AWARDED THE PENALTY KICK, BECAUSE OF HANDBALL OFFENCE. VAR CHECKED THE SITUATION AND FOLLOWING THE VAR  PROTOCOL INSTRUCTION NO CLEAR AND OBVIOUS MISTAKE, DID NOT INTERVENED CORRECTLY.
CONSIDERATION FOR  NO VAR  INTERVENTION:
-HAND / ARM OUT  OF THE BODY MADE A BODY BIGGER 
-BALL CLEARLY  TOUCHED  BY  THE HAND
 
VIDEO ΟΛΥΜΠΙΑΚΟΣ - ΔΟΞΑ, 80ο λεπτό

Last News

Επόμενοι Αγώνες

Αχαιών 10 2413 - Έγκωμη Λευκωσία Κύπρος

Tel. : +357 22352341 , +357 77771606

Fax : +357 22590544

Postal Address : Τ.Θ. 25071, 1306 - Λευκωσία Κύπρος

Email : info@cfa.com.cy

Copyright © 2018 CFA | Privacy policy - Terms of Use - Cookie Policy | Developed and Hosted by Change your consent